Instinctive Nutrition (v2.0) by Severen Schaeffer

Author:Severen Schaeffer
Language: eng
Format: mobi
Published: 2012-02-23T05:00:00+00:00

Chapter 13

Food and Cancer

Cancer cells are mutant cells that should normally be destroyed by the immunological system as soon as they appear. But the immune system is dozing, so to speak. It is already in a generalized state of tolerance; it has become passive. It has given up destroying not only pseudo-metabolites, but cancer cells as well.

Cancer cells might even be presumed to be feeding upon pseudo-metabolites (for they apparently fail to thrive in their absence). Their aberrant development might be thought of as a perfectly normal but unsuccessful attempt to adapt to aberrant food or other abnormal ("carcinogenic") input — a hypothesis fully as plausible as any other. In any case, no devilish "agent" makes cells cancerous; they become that way themselves.

While the relationship between abnormal food and cancer has yet to be correlated precisely, it is strongly supported (if we will look beyond our cooking pots to see it) by the results of a highly reputable study entitled, "Nutrition and Its Relationship to Cancel'," sponsored by the National Health Foundation:

Following up on leads advanced by epidemiologists, experimentalists have found that nutrition, in general, is related to the development of cancer in three ways: 1) Food additives or contaminants may act as carcinogens, cocarcinogens or both. 2) Nutrient deficiencies may lead to biochemical alterations that promote neoplastic processes. 3) Changes in the intake of selected macronutrients may produce metabolic and biochemical abnormalities, either directly or indirectly, which increase the risk for cancer.'

The study nowhere suggests that denatured nutrients might play a role in the etiology of cancer. The assumption is so widespread that cooked, canned, and frozen foods are "normal" for humans, that this omission should not be surprising. But the inference is suggested, for the study notes:

In Japan . . . an increasing trend has appeared associated with the progressive westernization of the Japanese dietary intake since 1945. This also provides some evidence that the dietary pattern, rather than the industrial activity, is one of the important factors in relation to causative mechanisms for these types of cancer: colon, breast, prostate. 2

The study covered six types of cancer, including breast, large bowel, stomach, and head and neck, for which:

. . . the epidemiological evidence is overwhelming that nutritional factors have a major etiological role. Indeed, the epidemiological data on diet and nutrition in these four cancers provided the leads for metabolic and animal model studies that now fully support their epidemiological inspiration.'

The study states that for cancers of the pancreas and prostate, "the epidemiological evidence (for nutritional causative factors) is presently not overwhelming!'

From the Anopsological viewpoint, there is no doubt whatsoever that denatured nutrients — or more specifically, their inevitable mis-metabolism — play a major role in the etiology of any type of cancer. We need only smell the patients. Every cancer patient ever examined under Anopsotherapeutic conditions carried highly unpleasant odors — often suggesting putrified milk products. More significantly yet: as their tumors faded so did their body odors.

We might think of a cancer as a campground

Download

Copyright Disclaimer:
This site does not store any files on its server. We only index and link to content provided by other sites. Please contact the content providers to delete copyright contents if any and email us, we'll remove relevant links or contents immediately.